<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (3) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285498</link>
    <description>Valuation of work in progress for income-tax purposes is a fact-specific exercise governed by ordinary commercial accounting practice and whether the resulting figure fairly reflects profits. The direct cost method and the on-cost method are not universal rules of law, and neither can be applied mechanically in every case. On the facts discussed, the on-cost method was said to produce an inflated and unrealistic valuation because slack business conditions caused a larger share of overheads to be attributed to work in progress. The assessment therefore turned on whether the chosen method fairly stated taxable profits for the relevant years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:48:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (3) TMI 67 - HIGH COURT OF CALCUTTA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285498</link>
      <description>Valuation of work in progress for income-tax purposes is a fact-specific exercise governed by ordinary commercial accounting practice and whether the resulting figure fairly reflects profits. The direct cost method and the on-cost method are not universal rules of law, and neither can be applied mechanically in every case. On the facts discussed, the on-cost method was said to produce an inflated and unrealistic valuation because slack business conditions caused a larger share of overheads to be attributed to work in progress. The assessment therefore turned on whether the chosen method fairly stated taxable profits for the relevant years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285498</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>