<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285497</link>
    <description>A sub-tenant claiming protection under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 must establish the landlord&#039;s prior written consent and statutory notice of the sub-tenancy. Where those mandatory requirements are not proved, the sub-tenant acquires no enforceable right to be impleaded in the landlord&#039;s eviction suit, and the eviction decree against the tenant binds the sub-tenant as well. A bilateral arrangement between tenant and alleged sub-tenant cannot defeat the landlord&#039;s statutory right to evict. In that setting, allegations of fraud and collusion do not survive as an independent basis to resist the decree.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:01:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 1172 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285497</link>
      <description>A sub-tenant claiming protection under the West Bengal Premises Tenancy Act, 1956 must establish the landlord&#039;s prior written consent and statutory notice of the sub-tenancy. Where those mandatory requirements are not proved, the sub-tenant acquires no enforceable right to be impleaded in the landlord&#039;s eviction suit, and the eviction decree against the tenant binds the sub-tenant as well. A bilateral arrangement between tenant and alleged sub-tenant cannot defeat the landlord&#039;s statutory right to evict. In that setting, allegations of fraud and collusion do not survive as an independent basis to resist the decree.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>