<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1183 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285494</link>
    <description>The High Court considered the treatment of liabilities towards gratuity and leave encashment under the Income Tax Act. It examined whether the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal correctly treated gratuity liability as unascertained, and if the deduction for leave encashment liability was allowed. The Court also reviewed the decision not to deduct an additional amount from income for unclaimed deductions. The judgment focused on clarifying the interpretation and application of relevant provisions of the Act concerning these liabilities and deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:03:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1183 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285494</link>
      <description>The High Court considered the treatment of liabilities towards gratuity and leave encashment under the Income Tax Act. It examined whether the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal correctly treated gratuity liability as unascertained, and if the deduction for leave encashment liability was allowed. The Court also reviewed the decision not to deduct an additional amount from income for unclaimed deductions. The judgment focused on clarifying the interpretation and application of relevant provisions of the Act concerning these liabilities and deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285494</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>