<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 561 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking a review of its own order under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record in its original decision and justified its reliance on a Supreme Court precedent. It concluded that the Revenue&#039;s application exceeded the scope of rectification allowed under the Act, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:47:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600349" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 561 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s Miscellaneous Application seeking a review of its own order under section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal held that there was no mistake apparent from the record in its original decision and justified its reliance on a Supreme Court precedent. It concluded that the Revenue&#039;s application exceeded the scope of rectification allowed under the Act, leading to the dismissal of the application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>