<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 559 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, directing the AO to exclude the development fees from the income of the assessee society and to allow the depreciation claim. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following binding precedents and ensuring that factual inaccuracies do not influence judicial decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 559 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals of the assessee, directing the AO to exclude the development fees from the income of the assessee society and to allow the depreciation claim. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of following binding precedents and ensuring that factual inaccuracies do not influence judicial decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>