<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court May Have Erroneously Assumed Only Accused Must Provide Evidence to Rebut Presumption of Cheque Dishonor.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51232</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - rebuttal of presumption - All the important facts emanating from evidence, have not all been dealt and to me, it appears that the courts below have remained under an erroneous impression that the presumption has to be rebutted by the accused only by leading evidence from his side</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court May Have Erroneously Assumed Only Accused Must Provide Evidence to Rebut Presumption of Cheque Dishonor.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51232</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - rebuttal of presumption - All the important facts emanating from evidence, have not all been dealt and to me, it appears that the courts below have remained under an erroneous impression that the presumption has to be rebutted by the accused only by leading evidence from his side</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:15:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>