https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390939 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Tribunal to proceed with the appeal concerning the jurisdiction of the Transfer Pricing Officer and the rejection of the stay application. The appellant successfully argued against the TPO's authority to set 'Nil' arm's length pricing and the Tribunal's dismissal of the stay application. The Court allowed the appeal to proceed without coercive tax recovery measures until the next hearing date. en-us Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Jan 2020 08:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390939 The Court ruled in favor of the appellant, directing the Tribunal to proceed with the appeal concerning the jurisdiction of the Transfer Pricing Officer and the rejection of the stay application. The appellant successfully argued against the TPO's authority to set 'Nil' arm's length pricing and the Tribunal's dismissal of the stay application. The Court allowed the appeal to proceed without coercive tax recovery measures until the next hearing date. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 24 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390939