<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 549 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390936</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision and allowed the appeals filed by the appellants in a case involving the seizure of cloth items for alleged customs violations. The Tribunal cited procedural inconsistencies, lack of evidence, and failure to meet the burden of proof by the department. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Adjudication order, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 549 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390936</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal overturned the Commissioner&#039;s decision and allowed the appeals filed by the appellants in a case involving the seizure of cloth items for alleged customs violations. The Tribunal cited procedural inconsistencies, lack of evidence, and failure to meet the burden of proof by the department. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the Adjudication order, setting aside the Commissioner&#039;s decision and providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>