<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 544 - ATFEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390931</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld that the appellant company and its Managing Director contravened Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 by investing in step-down subsidiaries without RBI approval. Penalties imposed were deemed proportionate under FEMA, with the Managing Director held personally liable due to his involvement in company activities. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the penalties and rejecting requested reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 07:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600322" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 544 - ATFEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390931</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld that the appellant company and its Managing Director contravened Section 6(3)(a) of FEMA and Regulations 5, 6, and 13 by investing in step-down subsidiaries without RBI approval. Penalties imposed were deemed proportionate under FEMA, with the Managing Director held personally liable due to his involvement in company activities. The tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the penalties and rejecting requested reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>