<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 538 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390925</link>
    <description>A conditional exemption-based refund must be claimed in strict compliance with the prescribed procedure; a general RT-12 entry or ambiguous remark cannot substitute for the separate monthly statement required for verification and refund, so the refund claim failed. Refund arising from assessed RT-12 returns also cannot be entertained unless those assessments are first challenged and revised, and because no such challenge was made, the rejection of refund was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:14:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 538 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390925</link>
      <description>A conditional exemption-based refund must be claimed in strict compliance with the prescribed procedure; a general RT-12 entry or ambiguous remark cannot substitute for the separate monthly statement required for verification and refund, so the refund claim failed. Refund arising from assessed RT-12 returns also cannot be entertained unless those assessments are first challenged and revised, and because no such challenge was made, the rejection of refund was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390925</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>