<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1710 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285478</link>
    <description>Waste arising in sponge iron manufacture was classified on the basis of its composition and use: technical evidence showed the material was predominantly coal and it was used as fuel to generate heat, so it was treated as coal under Heading 2701.00 rather than as coal dust, slag or other waste from iron and steel manufacture under Heading 2619.00. The Commissioner (Appeals) therefore sustained the classification under Heading 2701.00, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:31:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1710 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285478</link>
      <description>Waste arising in sponge iron manufacture was classified on the basis of its composition and use: technical evidence showed the material was predominantly coal and it was used as fuel to generate heat, so it was treated as coal under Heading 2701.00 rather than as coal dust, slag or other waste from iron and steel manufacture under Heading 2619.00. The Commissioner (Appeals) therefore sustained the classification under Heading 2701.00, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>