<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (9) TMI 14 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21028</link>
    <description>The High Court held that &quot;majuri&quot; payments made to partners were considered as remuneration and disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that section 40(b) applies to all payments made to partners by the firm, without distinguishing between different capacities of the partner. The Court directed the Tribunal to assess the genuineness of expenses incurred by partners to determine the actual amount of remuneration subject to disallowance. The Court answered most issues against the assessee, except for one due to insufficient evidence, and the matter was referred back to the Tribunal for further examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:59:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60027" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (9) TMI 14 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21028</link>
      <description>The High Court held that &quot;majuri&quot; payments made to partners were considered as remuneration and disallowed under section 40(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court emphasized that section 40(b) applies to all payments made to partners by the firm, without distinguishing between different capacities of the partner. The Court directed the Tribunal to assess the genuineness of expenses incurred by partners to determine the actual amount of remuneration subject to disallowance. The Court answered most issues against the assessee, except for one due to insufficient evidence, and the matter was referred back to the Tribunal for further examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21028</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>