<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 517 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390904</link>
    <description>Assessment under section 153A concerned allegation of generation of unaccounted money and its purported conversion into share capital as an accommodation entry; the reliance on third-party statements was central to the challenge. The appellate authorities CIT(A) and ITAT found the additions unsustainable and deleted them on evidentiary grounds, and the special leave petition seeking interference was dismissed by the SC, leaving the deletions intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 18:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 517 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390904</link>
      <description>Assessment under section 153A concerned allegation of generation of unaccounted money and its purported conversion into share capital as an accommodation entry; the reliance on third-party statements was central to the challenge. The appellate authorities CIT(A) and ITAT found the additions unsustainable and deleted them on evidentiary grounds, and the special leave petition seeking interference was dismissed by the SC, leaving the deletions intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>