https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390902 Where the appellate tribunal under the U.P. GST Act had not yet been constituted, the Allahabad HC entertained the writ petition and granted interim protection against coercive recovery. The petitioner was directed to make the statutory pre-deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax, and the balance recovery was stayed during pendency of the petition. The Court did not decide the merits of the challenge to tax and penalty, leaving those issues open for consideration in the writ proceedings. en-us Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390902 Where the appellate tribunal under the U.P. GST Act had not yet been constituted, the Allahabad HC entertained the writ petition and granted interim protection against coercive recovery. The petitioner was directed to make the statutory pre-deposit of 20% of the remaining disputed tax, and the balance recovery was stayed during pendency of the petition. The Court did not decide the merits of the challenge to tax and penalty, leaving those issues open for consideration in the writ proceedings. Case-Laws GST Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390902