<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390891</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to remand the case for the Adjudicating Authority to determine the jurisdiction issue in light of the pending judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. The appeal challenging the correctness and legality of the Final Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was rejected, with the High Court finding no substantial question of law except for an exception mentioned in the CESTAT order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 504 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390891</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal to remand the case for the Adjudicating Authority to determine the jurisdiction issue in light of the pending judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Apex Court. The appeal challenging the correctness and legality of the Final Order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal was rejected, with the High Court finding no substantial question of law except for an exception mentioned in the CESTAT order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>