<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (2) TMI 82 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21013</link>
    <description>HC held that when an assessee is permitted to change the method of valuing closing stock going forward, the opening stock need not be revalued by excluding overhead expenses. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to recast opening stock to exclude all overheads was unjustified. The specific question referred was answered against the Tribunal and in favour of the assessee. No order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 14:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60012" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (2) TMI 82 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21013</link>
      <description>HC held that when an assessee is permitted to change the method of valuing closing stock going forward, the opening stock need not be revalued by excluding overhead expenses. The Tribunal&#039;s direction to recast opening stock to exclude all overheads was unjustified. The specific question referred was answered against the Tribunal and in favour of the assessee. No order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>