<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 452 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390839</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the interest levied under section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the date of online payment should be considered as the payment date, aligning with the ITAT Chennai Bench&#039;s ruling on cheque payments. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the payment method in determining the tax payment date, citing the legal framework of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 19:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600109" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 452 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390839</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeals, canceling the interest levied under section 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act. It held that the date of online payment should be considered as the payment date, aligning with the ITAT Chennai Bench&#039;s ruling on cheque payments. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the payment method in determining the tax payment date, citing the legal framework of the Negotiable Instruments Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>