<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed various expense deletions, including community welfare, temple, prior year&#039;s, and mines prospecting expenses. It upheld the treatment of foreign exchange gains, employees&#039; stock option expenses, and certain disallowances. The Tribunal confirmed adjustments for excise duty, sales tax, MAT credit, and capital gains. It directed re-adjudication on service charges and unutilized MODVAT credit. The Tribunal remitted issues on interest income, truck hire charges, and additional grounds for further consideration. Both parties&#039; appeals were partly allowed, and the AO was instructed to recalculate the assessee&#039;s income accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:50:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 446 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed various expense deletions, including community welfare, temple, prior year&#039;s, and mines prospecting expenses. It upheld the treatment of foreign exchange gains, employees&#039; stock option expenses, and certain disallowances. The Tribunal confirmed adjustments for excise duty, sales tax, MAT credit, and capital gains. It directed re-adjudication on service charges and unutilized MODVAT credit. The Tribunal remitted issues on interest income, truck hire charges, and additional grounds for further consideration. Both parties&#039; appeals were partly allowed, and the AO was instructed to recalculate the assessee&#039;s income accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>