<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 436 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390823</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original issued by the Commissioner of Customs, finding errors in the redetermination of the value of imported goods and the conditions imposed on clearance for home consumption. The Tribunal held that goods in conformity with the declaration should not have been included for redetermination, and the requirement of clearance for home consumption after redemption was deemed inappropriate. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:46:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 436 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390823</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original issued by the Commissioner of Customs, finding errors in the redetermination of the value of imported goods and the conditions imposed on clearance for home consumption. The Tribunal held that goods in conformity with the declaration should not have been included for redetermination, and the requirement of clearance for home consumption after redemption was deemed inappropriate. The matter was remanded back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh decision in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390823</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>