<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390822</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of goods as Aluminium Scrap or Aluminium Alloy Ingots. Despite the high Aluminium content, the goods were correctly declared as Aluminium Scrap &#039;Throb&#039; in import documents. The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties, as there was no evidence contradicting the description of the goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2020 07:46:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 435 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390822</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning the classification of goods as Aluminium Scrap or Aluminium Alloy Ingots. Despite the high Aluminium content, the goods were correctly declared as Aluminium Scrap &#039;Throb&#039; in import documents. The Tribunal set aside the demand for duty, interest, and penalties, as there was no evidence contradicting the description of the goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390822</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>