<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 1421 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285441</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the sale process of Nicco House, finding that the Liquidator followed prescribed procedures, including obtaining valuations and conducting public auctions. Compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and relevant regulations was confirmed. Allegations of undervaluation and private arrangements were dismissed, with the sale deemed transparent. Claims of unauthorized construction and lack of building plans were rejected. The rights and interests of tenants/occupants were preserved, with the sale not impacting their occupation rights. The applications challenging the sale were dismissed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:55:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600039" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 1421 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285441</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the legality of the sale process of Nicco House, finding that the Liquidator followed prescribed procedures, including obtaining valuations and conducting public auctions. Compliance with the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and relevant regulations was confirmed. Allegations of undervaluation and private arrangements were dismissed, with the sale deemed transparent. Claims of unauthorized construction and lack of building plans were rejected. The rights and interests of tenants/occupants were preserved, with the sale not impacting their occupation rights. The applications challenging the sale were dismissed, and parties were directed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285441</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>