https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285437 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, after finding an error in denying the appellant's cross-examination request. The decision, influenced by precedents from the High Courts of Punjab & Haryana and Chhattisgarh, underscored the importance of procedural fairness and compliance with legal standards. All appeals were disposed of, directing the adjudicating authority to reassess the issue, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice. en-us Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285437 The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority, emphasizing the necessity of adhering to Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944, after finding an error in denying the appellant's cross-examination request. The decision, influenced by precedents from the High Courts of Punjab & Haryana and Chhattisgarh, underscored the importance of procedural fairness and compliance with legal standards. All appeals were disposed of, directing the adjudicating authority to reassess the issue, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 28 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285437