<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1675 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285439</link>
    <description>A cheque issued solely under a Lok Adalat compromise does not establish a fresh legally enforceable debt or liability for invoking cheque-dishonour proceedings. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires that the cheque be drawn towards discharge, wholly or partly, of a subsisting legally enforceable debt or other liability. Where the cheque only records a settlement relating to an earlier transaction and the compromise fails, this foundational requirement is not met. A second complaint based on the same underlying transaction is therefore not maintainable; cognizance orders may be set aside and the complaint quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 12:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1675 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285439</link>
      <description>A cheque issued solely under a Lok Adalat compromise does not establish a fresh legally enforceable debt or liability for invoking cheque-dishonour proceedings. Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act requires that the cheque be drawn towards discharge, wholly or partly, of a subsisting legally enforceable debt or other liability. Where the cheque only records a settlement relating to an earlier transaction and the compromise fails, this foundational requirement is not met. A second complaint based on the same underlying transaction is therefore not maintainable; cognizance orders may be set aside and the complaint quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>