<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessing Officer Cannot Add Unexplained Expenditure u/s 69C in Later Proceedings if Initially Omitted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51163</link>
    <description>Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the first round of proceedings, there was no addition made u/s. 69C by the revenue. AO could not have made any addition u/s. 69C in the second round of proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 07:11:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 07:11:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=600005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessing Officer Cannot Add Unexplained Expenditure u/s 69C in Later Proceedings if Initially Omitted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51163</link>
      <description>Addition u/s.69C - unexplained expenditure - Admittedly, in the first round of proceedings, there was no addition made u/s. 69C by the revenue. AO could not have made any addition u/s. 69C in the second round of proceedings.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 07:11:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>