https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390779 The court allowed the correction of an order dated 05.12.2019 to record the presence of the counsel for respondent No. 1. It confirmed the tax payment for May 2019 and assured no separate tax demand for that month. The petitioner was permitted to file a physical application for advance ruling due to electronic system limitations, with instructions to deposit the fee and provide a physical challan for processing. The judgment resolved these issues, ensuring the petitioner's rights were protected and directing prompt processing of the physical application by the authorities. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390779 The court allowed the correction of an order dated 05.12.2019 to record the presence of the counsel for respondent No. 1. It confirmed the tax payment for May 2019 and assured no separate tax demand for that month. The petitioner was permitted to file a physical application for advance ruling due to electronic system limitations, with instructions to deposit the fee and provide a physical challan for processing. The judgment resolved these issues, ensuring the petitioner's rights were protected and directing prompt processing of the physical application by the authorities. Case-Laws GST Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390779