<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 389 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390776</link>
    <description>The writ petition concerned a claim for exemption in relation to the assessment of Bills of Entry. The HC directed the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner&#039;s representation by a speaking order within the stipulated time, and to take an appropriate decision on the exemption claim. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the claim, so the dispute was left for administrative determination on the material before the authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 06:52:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 389 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390776</link>
      <description>The writ petition concerned a claim for exemption in relation to the assessment of Bills of Entry. The HC directed the competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner&#039;s representation by a speaking order within the stipulated time, and to take an appropriate decision on the exemption claim. No opinion was expressed on the merits of the claim, so the dispute was left for administrative determination on the material before the authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>