<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 385 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390772</link>
    <description>The challenge to the amendment of Article 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Court upheld the validity of the amendment introduced through the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015, which altered the jurisdiction for trying offenses under Section 138. The Court affirmed the legislative authority to amend laws to align with policy objectives, emphasizing that legislation can supersede judicial decisions. The petition was dismissed, confirming the Parliament&#039;s competence to enact such amendments and highlighting the supremacy of legislative authority in addressing legal inconsistencies or policy considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jan 2020 06:51:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 385 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390772</link>
      <description>The challenge to the amendment of Article 142(2) of the Negotiable Instruments Act was dismissed by the Supreme Court. The Court upheld the validity of the amendment introduced through the Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act, 2015, which altered the jurisdiction for trying offenses under Section 138. The Court affirmed the legislative authority to amend laws to align with policy objectives, emphasizing that legislation can supersede judicial decisions. The petition was dismissed, confirming the Parliament&#039;s competence to enact such amendments and highlighting the supremacy of legislative authority in addressing legal inconsistencies or policy considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390772</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>