<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (6) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20999</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B for freight and insurance expenses for the assessment year 1975-76, citing a previous decision. The court also upheld the decision to deny the deduction of surtax liability in computing income for the relevant accounting period, referencing another case. The assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction for head office expenses related to exports was partially allowed based on a formula accepted by the Department, with the court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and finding no reason to interfere. Costs were not awarded to either party.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59998" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (6) TMI 2 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20999</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction under section 35B for freight and insurance expenses for the assessment year 1975-76, citing a previous decision. The court also upheld the decision to deny the deduction of surtax liability in computing income for the relevant accounting period, referencing another case. The assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction for head office expenses related to exports was partially allowed based on a formula accepted by the Department, with the court affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision and finding no reason to interfere. Costs were not awarded to either party.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>