<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 382 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390769</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, finding it a valid interim measure to prevent property alienation pending final adjudication. The court noted that the petitioner had been issued a show cause notice as required by the Act and emphasized the provisional attachment&#039;s statutory basis to maintain the status quo. It ruled that the order was necessary to preserve the property during proceedings, allowing both parties to present their defenses. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, finding insufficient grounds to interfere with the attachment order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 21:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 382 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390769</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988, finding it a valid interim measure to prevent property alienation pending final adjudication. The court noted that the petitioner had been issued a show cause notice as required by the Act and emphasized the provisional attachment&#039;s statutory basis to maintain the status quo. It ruled that the order was necessary to preserve the property during proceedings, allowing both parties to present their defenses. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition, finding insufficient grounds to interfere with the attachment order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>