<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (8) TMI 1920 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285418</link>
    <description>The High Court reversed the CESTAT judgment, condoning the delay of 717 days in filing the appeal. Despite the significant delay, the Court accepted the explanation provided by the assessee and emphasized deciding matters on their merits rather than technicalities. The tax appeal was remitted for disposal on substantive grounds, focusing on justice and fairness in the proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (8) TMI 1920 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285418</link>
      <description>The High Court reversed the CESTAT judgment, condoning the delay of 717 days in filing the appeal. Despite the significant delay, the Court accepted the explanation provided by the assessee and emphasized deciding matters on their merits rather than technicalities. The tax appeal was remitted for disposal on substantive grounds, focusing on justice and fairness in the proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285418</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>