<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20993</link>
    <description>The court held that the assessee could not claim exemption for the living allowance received as it did not meet the requirement of being wholly, necessarily, and exclusively incurred in the performance of duties. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and denying the exemption under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:13:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 50 - PATNA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20993</link>
      <description>The court held that the assessee could not claim exemption for the living allowance received as it did not meet the requirement of being wholly, necessarily, and exclusively incurred in the performance of duties. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and denying the exemption under section 10(14) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>