https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285396 Obstruction of a lane over which the public had a right of passage was treated as interference with an existing right of way, not as a completed trespass affecting possession. Although the lane was not a public street within the municipal definition, the obstruction was held to be a continuing wrong, so the cause of action renewed for as long as it continued. Limitation therefore did not bar the suit, and the claim for removal of the obstructions was within time and upheld. en-us Thu, 09 Oct 1941 00:00:00 +0630 Fri, 10 Jan 2020 11:07:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285396 Obstruction of a lane over which the public had a right of passage was treated as interference with an existing right of way, not as a completed trespass affecting possession. Although the lane was not a public street within the municipal definition, the obstruction was held to be a continuing wrong, so the cause of action renewed for as long as it continued. Limitation therefore did not bar the suit, and the claim for removal of the obstructions was within time and upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 Oct 1941 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285396