<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (6) TMI 60 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285391</link>
    <description>Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 extends to monetary statutory benefits capable of computation, so a Labour Court may determine retrenchment compensation claimed under Section 25-FF. A claim arising from transfer of an undertaking under Section 25-FF is an individual workman&#039;s statutory entitlement and is cognisable by the Labour Court, without being confined to the Industrial Tribunal. The proviso to Section 25-FF applies only if service is uninterrupted, post-transfer conditions are not less favourable, and the new employer is legally liable on continuous service; where those conditions are not met, retrenchment compensation remains payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 09:31:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (6) TMI 60 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285391</link>
      <description>Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 extends to monetary statutory benefits capable of computation, so a Labour Court may determine retrenchment compensation claimed under Section 25-FF. A claim arising from transfer of an undertaking under Section 25-FF is an individual workman&#039;s statutory entitlement and is cognisable by the Labour Court, without being confined to the Industrial Tribunal. The proviso to Section 25-FF applies only if service is uninterrupted, post-transfer conditions are not less favourable, and the new employer is legally liable on continuous service; where those conditions are not met, retrenchment compensation remains payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>