<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 49 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20989</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first two issues, determining that the asset was a capital asset and the profit was capital gain. The third issue was deemed academic and not answered. The fourth issue was resolved in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of unabsorbed loss and depreciation under the specified conditions. No order as to costs was made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:01:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 49 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20989</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue on the first two issues, determining that the asset was a capital asset and the profit was capital gain. The third issue was deemed academic and not answered. The fourth issue was resolved in favor of the assessee, allowing the set off of unabsorbed loss and depreciation under the specified conditions. No order as to costs was made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>