<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 344 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390731</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition solely on the ground of low tax effect, indicating that the tax consequence did not justify further adjudication. The order reflects judicial administration of court time and disposes of the petition without examining the merits or recording any substantive determination on the underlying income tax dispute. Leave to appeal was refused for that reason alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599876" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 344 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390731</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition solely on the ground of low tax effect, indicating that the tax consequence did not justify further adjudication. The order reflects judicial administration of court time and disposes of the petition without examining the merits or recording any substantive determination on the underlying income tax dispute. Leave to appeal was refused for that reason alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>