<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390725</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders of the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) and the Appellate Authority, remitting the matter back to the AAR for a fresh decision on the original query regarding the nature of the supply of medical instruments without consideration. The AAR was directed to pass fresh orders within six weeks, considering the observations made in this judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599868" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 338 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390725</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders of the Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) and the Appellate Authority, remitting the matter back to the AAR for a fresh decision on the original query regarding the nature of the supply of medical instruments without consideration. The AAR was directed to pass fresh orders within six weeks, considering the observations made in this judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390725</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>