<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390707</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the department had properly refunded the sale proceeds of the gold as received in 2001. The appellant was not entitled to the gold or its market value as of 2015. The Tribunal found no fault in the order and upheld the compliance with statutory procedures for the disposal of the seized gold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599840" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 320 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390707</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, ruling that the department had properly refunded the sale proceeds of the gold as received in 2001. The appellant was not entitled to the gold or its market value as of 2015. The Tribunal found no fault in the order and upheld the compliance with statutory procedures for the disposal of the seized gold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>