https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390702 The Tribunal dismissed the objection regarding the CISF's authority to intercept gold, finding they acted within their duty. The seizure of gold bangles under the Customs Act was deemed lawful based on reasonable suspicion. The Tribunal accepted the appellants' ownership claim supported by consistent statements and credible purchase documents. The Tribunal concluded the case lacked substantial evidence, overturning the confiscation of gold bangles and penalties imposed. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing relief to the appellants. en-us Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Nov 2020 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390702 The Tribunal dismissed the objection regarding the CISF's authority to intercept gold, finding they acted within their duty. The seizure of gold bangles under the Customs Act was deemed lawful based on reasonable suspicion. The Tribunal accepted the appellants' ownership claim supported by consistent statements and credible purchase documents. The Tribunal concluded the case lacked substantial evidence, overturning the confiscation of gold bangles and penalties imposed. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned order was set aside, providing relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390702