<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs Valuation Case Highlights Improper Adjudication Practices with Quick Succession Show Cause Notices, Undermining Legal Spirit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51135</link>
    <description>Issuance of two SCNs - Valuation of imported goods - Issuing 2 notices in too short a time may suffice the requirements of law in letter but the spirit of the same defeated - the instant case serves as a perfect example to show case as to how adjudication order is not supposed to be passed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:55:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:55:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599819" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs Valuation Case Highlights Improper Adjudication Practices with Quick Succession Show Cause Notices, Undermining Legal Spirit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51135</link>
      <description>Issuance of two SCNs - Valuation of imported goods - Issuing 2 notices in too short a time may suffice the requirements of law in letter but the spirit of the same defeated - the instant case serves as a perfect example to show case as to how adjudication order is not supposed to be passed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2020 06:55:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=51135</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>