https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285389 The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. The Tribunal held that the appellant was engaged in manufacturing excisable goods and not in supplying manpower, thus not liable for service tax under "Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services." The issue of jurisdiction was left open, and the argument of revenue neutrality was acknowledged but not conclusively addressed. en-us Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2020 19:46:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285389 The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed with consequential relief. The Tribunal held that the appellant was engaged in manufacturing excisable goods and not in supplying manpower, thus not liable for service tax under "Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services." The issue of jurisdiction was left open, and the argument of revenue neutrality was acknowledged but not conclusively addressed. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 18 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285389