https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285375 A written report by a public servant was sufficient to support cognizance where it fairly described the alleged contraventions, even without a detailed charge-sheet or full witness list. The controlled price orders were proved by official documents and by evidence of circulation to affected dealers, with regularity of official acts presumed. Extra sums demanded as a condition of delivery were treated as part of the sale price, so the controlled price orders were breached. Evidence of similar transactions and accomplice testimony was admissible to prove knowledge and intentional participation, and criminal liability was not imposed without mens rea unless clearly excluded by the governing text. en-us Mon, 28 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2020 13:03:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285375 A written report by a public servant was sufficient to support cognizance where it fairly described the alleged contraventions, even without a detailed charge-sheet or full witness list. The controlled price orders were proved by official documents and by evidence of circulation to affected dealers, with regularity of official acts presumed. Extra sums demanded as a condition of delivery were treated as part of the sale price, so the controlled price orders were breached. Evidence of similar transactions and accomplice testimony was admissible to prove knowledge and intentional participation, and criminal liability was not imposed without mens rea unless clearly excluded by the governing text. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Apr 1947 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285375