<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1960 (2) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285373</link>
    <description>False statements imputing murder, violence, or other wicked conduct to a candidate&#039;s personal character may amount to corrupt practice when published in circumstances reasonably calculated to prejudice electoral prospects. The text also explains that the legal burden and evidentiary burden on falsity and bona fide belief are distinct; once the election petitioner enters the witness box and denies the allegations, the evidentiary burden may shift, and unsupported imputations will fail. It further states that, in an election appeal, the High Court may reassess facts and evidence within its statutory appellate powers and is not barred from differing from the Tribunal where reasons justify that course.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 11:47:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1960 (2) TMI 75 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285373</link>
      <description>False statements imputing murder, violence, or other wicked conduct to a candidate&#039;s personal character may amount to corrupt practice when published in circumstances reasonably calculated to prejudice electoral prospects. The text also explains that the legal burden and evidentiary burden on falsity and bona fide belief are distinct; once the election petitioner enters the witness box and denies the allegations, the evidentiary burden may shift, and unsupported imputations will fail. It further states that, in an election appeal, the High Court may reassess facts and evidence within its statutory appellate powers and is not barred from differing from the Tribunal where reasons justify that course.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 1960 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>