<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 302 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390689</link>
    <description>The Respondent was found to have contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the buyers. The total profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 51,12,928/-, with the Respondent directed to pass this amount to the buyers along with interest. Further investigation was ordered to calculate the final ITC benefit post-December 2018, and a Show Cause Notice was issued for potential penalty under Section 171(3A) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2025 12:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599778" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 302 - NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390689</link>
      <description>The Respondent was found to have contravened Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017, by not passing on the benefit of additional Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the buyers. The total profiteered amount was determined to be Rs. 51,12,928/-, with the Respondent directed to pass this amount to the buyers along with interest. Further investigation was ordered to calculate the final ITC benefit post-December 2018, and a Show Cause Notice was issued for potential penalty under Section 171(3A) of the CGST Act, 2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>