https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20978 Chapter XX-C confined the appropriate authority to a limited statutory enquiry on whether to exercise pre-emptive purchase or issue clearance for transfer. It could not conduct a roving enquiry into the validity of the agreement, the title of the transferors, partnership law, personal law, or declare the agreement ab initio void. Because the impugned rejection rested on matters outside the statutory scope, it was beyond jurisdiction and was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law, with the later decree in favour of the petitioners to be considered on remand. en-us Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:36:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20978 Chapter XX-C confined the appropriate authority to a limited statutory enquiry on whether to exercise pre-emptive purchase or issue clearance for transfer. It could not conduct a roving enquiry into the validity of the agreement, the title of the transferors, partnership law, personal law, or declare the agreement ab initio void. Because the impugned rejection rested on matters outside the statutory scope, it was beyond jurisdiction and was set aside. The matter was remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law, with the later decree in favour of the petitioners to be considered on remand. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Feb 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20978