https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285366 Where title had passed under a sale but the purchase price remained unpaid, the seller was limited to the statutory charge on the property for the unpaid amount and interest. The seller could not obtain a conditional decree for possession as a substitute remedy, because after conveyance the proper course is enforcement of the charge rather than recovery of possession on payment default. The earlier authorities were treated as consistent with that rule. The conditional decree for possession was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving the seller to recover the unpaid price with a charge on the suit property in default. en-us Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:22:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285366 Where title had passed under a sale but the purchase price remained unpaid, the seller was limited to the statutory charge on the property for the unpaid amount and interest. The seller could not obtain a conditional decree for possession as a substitute remedy, because after conveyance the proper course is enforcement of the charge rather than recovery of possession on payment default. The earlier authorities were treated as consistent with that rule. The conditional decree for possession was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, leaving the seller to recover the unpaid price with a charge on the suit property in default. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 26 Mar 1965 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285366