<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 273 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390660</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, an exporter of services, was entitled to a refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. The rejection of the refund claim was deemed improper and illegal as the services in question were directly used for providing output services, making them eligible for credit. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 10:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599724" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 273 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390660</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appellant, an exporter of services, was entitled to a refund of unutilized CENVAT credit. The rejection of the refund claim was deemed improper and illegal as the services in question were directly used for providing output services, making them eligible for credit. The Tribunal set aside the previous orders and allowed the appeals with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390660</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>