<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 272 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390659</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit on premium paid for a Keyman Insurance Policy was held admissible where the company was the beneficiary under the policy. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and applied Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to treat the premium as an input service. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2021 13:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 272 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390659</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit on premium paid for a Keyman Insurance Policy was held admissible where the company was the beneficiary under the policy. The Tribunal treated the issue as covered by its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own case and applied Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 to treat the premium as an input service. On that basis, the demand, interest and penalty were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390659</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>