<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390651</link>
    <description>The Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal was held to have power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that provision supplements a special arbitration statute unless inconsistent with it. Since the Gujarat Act contemplated interim adjudicatory powers and barred civil court jurisdiction, the Tribunal remained the proper forum for testing the State&#039;s recovery notice and any request for interim protection. The earlier reliance on Gangotri Enterprises was treated as per incuriam to the extent it rested on overruled authority. The dispute was therefore to proceed before the statutory tribunal on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 264 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390651</link>
      <description>The Gujarat Public Works Contracts Disputes Arbitration Tribunal was held to have power to grant interim relief under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, because that provision supplements a special arbitration statute unless inconsistent with it. Since the Gujarat Act contemplated interim adjudicatory powers and barred civil court jurisdiction, the Tribunal remained the proper forum for testing the State&#039;s recovery notice and any request for interim protection. The earlier reliance on Gangotri Enterprises was treated as per incuriam to the extent it rested on overruled authority. The dispute was therefore to proceed before the statutory tribunal on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=390651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>