https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285356 A construction arrangement involving both supply of goods and execution of work was held to be a composite contract classifiable as Works Contract Service, taxable only from 01.06.2007. Because the transaction had that character, it could not be reclassified and taxed under Construction of Residential Complex Service merely on the basis adopted by the department. The demand was therefore unsustainable under that service head, and relief followed for the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed. en-us Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:35:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285356 A construction arrangement involving both supply of goods and execution of work was held to be a composite contract classifiable as Works Contract Service, taxable only from 01.06.2007. Because the transaction had that character, it could not be reclassified and taxed under Construction of Residential Complex Service merely on the basis adopted by the department. The demand was therefore unsustainable under that service head, and relief followed for the assessee. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal was allowed. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 02 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285356