<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285354</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision upheld the duty determination methodology based on circulars and emphasized the need to consider the circumstances of the case when imposing penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 09:35:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=599701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1766 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285354</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal by reducing the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of Central Excise Rules, 2002. The decision upheld the duty determination methodology based on circulars and emphasized the need to consider the circumstances of the case when imposing penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285354</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>